« April 2007 | Main | June 2007 »

May 26, 2007

Here come the Indians, Part Two

This is the second in a series of three posts. The first one dealt with songs that ridicule Indians; this one concerns noble savages; and the third will deal with authentic Indians.

The trope of the noble savage can be traced back to Jean-Jacques Rousseau or perhaps even earlier. The noble savage was the embodiment of Western virtues, uncorrupted by civilization; the concept was applied equally to Polynesians (see Melville’s Typee), American Indians, and Africans, both enslaved and free. Because of the genocide perpetrated across the Americas, the representation of these noble savages took on an inevitably tragic air, and in popular song, the Indians almost always die at the end--they are America's number-one martyr.

Early in the twentieth century the myth of the noble savage was partially supplanted, under the influence of Darwin and Freud, by primitivism--the idea of the savage as brute, untamable, pure id. But this idea was applied far more to blacks than to Indians, perhaps because primitivism doesn’t go so well with martyrdom. In “Red Wing: An Indian Intermezzo” (1907), Red Wing’s lover dies in battle at the end of the second verse, but we never see him fight--we’re simply told he was brave, and we focus instead on his grieving squaw. Throughout the rest of this post, the Indians are Christ-like.

Our first MP3 file is Johnny Preston’s “Running Bear” (1959). While the background vocals sound pretty ridiculous, the singing is earnest; the Indians are fearless, constant, and die in the end.

Why Johnny Horton felt compelled to write “The Vanishing Race” (1960) I can’t tell. It’s certainly a far cry from his lame “Cherokee Boogie,” which he had recorded a year before. Horton was known for his story songs like “The Battle of New Orleans” and “North to Alaska,” though his best work was hardcore honky-tonk/rockabilly stuff like “Honky Tonk Hardwood Floor.” Which makes this song all the more atypical. Once more, we don’t actually see the Indians fight for their land--they simply die. But they do appear again in outer space, making this an eerie prefiguration of the Caetano Veloso, Kansas, and OutKast visions detailed below.

Johnny Cash devoted an entire album, Bitter Tears (1964), to the plight of the Indian, and here’s “Apache Tears,” which he wrote himself--another funeral dirge that says nothing about self-defense. (The album also includes a terrific cover of “The Vanishing Race.”) I’ll have more to say about this album in my next post; right now I’ll just mention that it stirred up a lot of animosity: it was banned from most country radio stations and the Ku Klux Klan burnt a cross on Cash’s lawn. That didn’t stop Bitter Tears from getting to number two on the Billboard country charts, though.

Even though it’s probably time to post something by someone not named Johnny, I’m sticking to chronological order here, and my next song was written by John D. Loudermilk, most famous for “Tobacco Road.” It’s Don Fardon’s “Indian Reservation” (1970), a hit both for him and for the Raiders. Here, at last, the Indians remain alive, reflecting the new consciousness of the 1970s. This may be the most straightforward, direct, and stirring political American Indian protest song not written by an Indian. Yet even without knowing the writer, his race is obvious. It’s simply too mythic, too hokey, for an Indian to have written it. It never feels real, lived in. You’ll have to wait until the next post for songs like that.

The next John to record a noble savage song, as far as I can tell, was Elton John, whose 1971 overblown seven-minute epic “Indian Sunset,” complete with piano, orchestra, and choir, adopts the point of view of a young renegade Indian who refuses to surrender to the white man and kills himself instead. I haven’t posted the MP3 because it’s simply too awful to listen to. “Oh, great father of the Iroquois, ever since I was young, I’ve read the writing of the smoke and breastfed on the sound of the drum,” Elton yells at the top of his lungs; a few seconds later the strings break into the kind of music that characterized the Indian attacks in ’50s Western movies. Heavy indeed.

Also too awful to listen to is Cher’s tragic tale of the “Half Breed,” which was a number-one hit in 1973, and which everybody probably knows. Cher wasn’t the first to sing about this subject--Ricky Nelson also had a hit called “Half Breed” in 1959, a lousy song whose chorus runs, “Half breed, they’re hot on your trail, boy, half breed, but you better not run. Half breed, you better get a gun, boy, better get a gun and stand, boy, better get a gun and stand.” Both songs depict the uncomfortable situation of the half-Indian half-white teenager, but nothing really happens in either one. As usual, we don’t see the protagonist actually practicing self-defense.

At some point between 1968 and 1972 Joe Ely wrote “The Indian Cowboy,” which he didn’t actually record until 2007. Guy Clark’s version (1989), which I’ve posted here, is probably the best; Tom Russell, Townes Van Zandt, and the Flatlanders also recorded it before Ely got around to doing his solo version. In it, an Indian rescues the circus from a fire by lassoing a horse. Now why wasn’t that good enough for Ely? Why does the Indian then have to pay for his courage with his life? See the rest of the songs in this post for the answer.

Neil Young spent practically his entire career singing songs about Indians, from “Broken Arrow” with Buffalo Springfield in 1967 to “Inca Queen” in 1987. “Cortez the Killer” is his most famous, but the best is definitely “Pocahontas,” whose basic track was recorded sometime between 1975 and 1977, though it wasn’t released until 1979. This completely insane song seems to cover all the bases. We’ve now come to expect the massacred martyrs, and considering Pocahontas as an exile in modern-day Hollywood is a nice twist. But to throw in “I wish I was a trapper: I would give a thousand pelts to sleep with Pocahontas” is taking things a bit far, don’t you think? Was it too much to hope that by the mid-1970s having sex with squaws would be out-of-date?

I mean, by this point both North and South Americans were starting to expect Indians to come down from outer space and save them in the not-too-distant future. This was Caetano Veloso’s vision in “Um indio” (1977), Kansas’s vision in their 1979 album MonolithMonolith, and OutKast’s vision in their 2004 Grammy Awards performance of “Hey Ya” (see previous post). In case your Portuguese is rusty, here are the lyrics to Caetano’s number, kindly translated by Julian Dibbell.

For some reason, most of the American Indian-themed songs of the 1980s came from Britain. Adam and the Ants’ stirring 1980 anthem “Kings of the Wild Frontier” begins, “I feel beneath the white there is a redskin suffering from centuries of taming.” Then come the chanted “heys,” surf guitars playing Western-movie melodies, and Adam complaining that he’s “just a shade too white.” This is hero-worship at its most primeval. But Iron Maiden went one step further in 1982 with their delirious “Run to the Hills,” probably the angriest Indian massacre song ever and one of my all-time favorite heavy metal numbers. And to top it all, the Cult, a British hard rock act formed in 1984, devoted practically their entire careers to the idea of the martyred noble savage. Yikes!

Tragic Indian songs seemed to have more or less dried up since then, with a few exceptions here and there (e.g. The Magnetic Fields’ 1994 “Fear of Trains,” not one of their better songs). If you know of any other recent numbers, please comment below.

Stay tuned: authentic Indian songs are coming up next.

- Yuval

P.S. Thanks to David Scott, Jake Austen, Jody Rosen, Josh Goldfein, and Julian Dibbell for alerting me to some of these numbers.

May 22, 2007

Here Come the Indians, Part One

I’ve been listening to songs about American Indians lately. You can divide them into three basic types, and I’m going to devote the next three posts to this taxonomy. Today I’ll be posting songs ridiculing Indians; the next post will be about noble savages and martyred heroes; and the third will be devoted to authentic American Indians. In all three, I’ll be featuring MP3s for you to download, but only of the good stuff.

Big_chief_wally_ho_woo Be forewarned: the songs in this first post are grossly offensive. There’s some great music here, but it doesn’t excuse the lyrics or the sentiment behind them. Here the Indians are laughingstocks, mocked for their customs and language or simply stereotyped for maximum chuckles. This tradition began in the nineteenth century or perhaps even earlier, but it continues undiminished until today. If you’re at all racially sensitive, these songs are guaranteed to make you see red (no pun intended).

Navajo_3 We’ll start at the dawn of the twentieth with “Navajo” (1903), pictured at left. This song is about the love of a “coon” for an Indian--the verses set up the situation, and the chorus has the “coon” sing, “Nava, Nava, my Navajo, I have a love for you that will grow. If you’ll have a coon for a beau, I’ll have a Navajo.” Now I don’t really know if “ho” carried the same meaning in 1903 that it carries today, or if “I have a love for you that will grow” carried the same sexual implications. But if so, this is a genuine forerunner to Slick Rick’s “Indian Girl” (see below).

There were plenty of others in this vein. Here are a few: “Mineola (or the Wedding of the Indian and the Coon)” (1904), “Big Indian Chief” (also 1904, with lyrics by the great black New York songwriter Rosamond Johnson, James Weldon’s brother), “Pawnee” (whose chorus runs, “Pawnee, oh my little love so tawny . . . Sleepy, leave your teepee,” etc.; 1906), “Arrah Wanna (An Indian Irish Matrimonial Venture)” (1906), and “Clysmic Water, Daughter of White Rock” (1920).

The prospect of Indian intermarriage with other ethnic groups was clearly considered hilarious. The one where the Indian marries the Jew is Blanche Merrill’s “I'm an Indian” (1921), here sung by the fabulous Fanny Brice. Irving Berlin was Jewish too, but “I’m an Indian, Too,” from his 1946 musical Annie Get Your Gun, wasn’t an answer song to Merrill’s number--it had little of its zip and sparkle.

It was left to Hank Williams and Fred Rose to write the next great Indian-clown song, “Kaw-Liga,” in 1952, though it wasn’t released until after Williams’s death. Everyone knows the original version, so I’ve decided to post Roy Orbison’s 1965 cover version, which brings to it an intensity that’s hard to conceive of if you’ve only heard Williams’s or Charley Pride’s hit versions. (If you want to hear more, the Residents recorded nine different versions on Poor Kaw-Liga’s Pain).

Ten Little Indians” is an old nursery rhyme, originally called “Ten Little Niggers.” In 1967, Harry Nilsson set it to music and changed the words to make them more Biblical. Now it’s more like “Ten Little Indians Flout the Ten Commandments” or something. As usual, I have no idea what was going through Nilsson’s head.

Loretta Lynn’s “Your Squaw Is on the Warpath” (1969) uses practically every cliché in the book and gives each one a fresh twist--all in two minutes flat.

Most of the Indian-themed songs of the 1970s fell either into the noble savage/martyr camp or were written by actual Indians--very few fit into the tradition I’m limning here. It was an era of greatly increased sensitivity about Indian affairs and troubles, and deriding Indians was, for a short time at least, unconscionable. One band from that decade, Siouxsee and the Banshees, gave themselves a silly Indian name, but they never performed any songs about Indians as far as I know. Even B.T. Express’s “Peace Pipe” refrained from the all-out scorn of the songs featured here; and despite Felipe Rose’s outrageous Indian costume, the Village People ignored Indians in their peace-and-love anthem “Go West.” The only exception I’ve found is Cory Daye’s glorious 1979 hit, the sadly out-of-print “Pow Wow.”

In the 1980s, though, making fun of Indians was cool again, God knows why. Maybe it was the ascension of Ronald Reagan, who killed plenty of fake Indians in The Last Outpost and actually played Custer in Santa Fe Trail. Anyway, the next few songs are as insulting as they get.

The Sugarhill Gang’s “Apache” (1981) took an old instrumental number (see Michaelangelo Matos’s “All Roads Lead to Apache,” a brilliant history of the song in all its permutations), rerecorded it with their own house band, and added some raps. Following the now ancient tradition of songs of this ilk, the Gang tries to have sex with the squaws.

The Gun Club’s “Bad Indian” (1983) portrays Indians as zombies. The lyrics are hard to make out, so here are a few lines: “Bad Indians--they love the land they hate; eat your flesh and then forget the taste. Someone describe that primal drive to consume what’s theirs and seek what’s mine. . . . You are like a ghost with crazy hands and mouth, a necklace made of eyeballs--you are like a bad Indian.” I suppose this song doesn’t really fit in with the rest of those in this post, but it doesn’t fit anywhere else either--it’s absolutely unique. It’s hateful, too, but it’s meant to be--it’s meant to make your skin crawl.

I’m not sure why Slick Rick decided to record X-rated songs about horny Indians not just on his first but on his second album too. “Indian Girl (An Adult Story)” (1988) is absolutely jawdropping in its gall--the punch line is unlike anything ever recorded in American music. “Tonto” (1991) is an altogether different matter. It’s from The Ruler’s Back, recorded in its entirety while Rick was out on bail for three weeks before his trial for attempted murder. Like the rest of the album, the lyrics are telegraphed incomprehensibly--even if you can figure them all out you can’t make head or tail of the story. Maybe that’s why The Ruler’s Back is my favorite hip-hop record--I can listen to it again and again and every time get something new from it. It’s manic, absurd, damn funky, and never fails to surprise me. Besides, what other rap album has songs about Moses, Tonto, Venus, James Bond, baby boys, and the many mistakes of Slick Rick?

Tim McGraw’s 1994 “Indian Outlaw” is probably the biggest-selling Indian song of all time, and one of the most reprehensible too. I’m not going to post it here because I hate it. The only interesting thing about it is that it features a quote from Paul Revere and the Raiders’ “Indian Reservation” at the end for no good reason.

Just so that you’re absolutely convinced that the tradition hasn’t died, we’ll conclude with a little minstrel number from the 2004 Grammy awards. Our next post will feature two additional examples of Indians coming in from outer space to save the world. So stay tuned.

- Yuval

P.S. Thanks to David Scott, Eric Weisbard, Jody Rosen, Jonathan Taylor, Josh Goldfein, and JP Chill for their suggestions.

May 04, 2007

Does the Overdub Undercut Jazz?

In 2002, jazz pianist Brad Mehldau released Largo. His most experimental--and best--record, it was produced by Jon Brion, celebrated for his film scores and his production of Fiona Apple’s records. It’s a real studio record--it doesn’t sound “live” at all. Here’s an example: Mehldau’s exquisite, moving, and effects-heavy cover of Radiohead’s “Paranoid Android.”

Inside the packaging appears the following statement. “All music was recorded live, on the floor. There were no overdubs.”

Why not? Because overdubs are more or less forbidden in jazz. They smack of inauthenticity. Jazz is music improvised live; if you overdub, you’re not really interacting with your fellow musicians. You’re faking it. Do a google search on “jazz” and “no overdubs” if you don’t believe me. Practically every aspiring jazz artist proclaims loudly that they don’t overdub. Ever.

What most people don’t know is that the first overdubbed record was made by one of the giants of jazz, and it was truly a jazz record: Sidney Bechet’s One Man Band’s 1941 “The Sheik of Araby.” This was done in the era before multitrack audiotape, so the fidelity grows worse and worse as Bechet layers on each instrument (soprano and tenor sax, clarinet, bass, drums, and piano). The American Federation of Musicians was so outraged by the record that they banned overdubbing for years. As for multitrack recording, it was invented by a jazz musician, Les Paul, whose most famous overdubbed recording was his absolutely wild 1947 “Lover,” featuring eight guitars recorded at various speeds.

Here are a few more landmarks in jazz overdubbing.

For Lennie Tristano’s 1955 “Line Up,” Tristano had the bass (Peter Ind) and drum (Jeff Morton) parts recorded first, then altered the tape speed and overdubbed his piano part.

Miles Davis’s 1957 masterpiece Miles Ahead relied extensively on overdubs. Here’s the ebullient “I Don't Wanna Be Kissed (By Anyone But You).” As Loren Schoenberg explains, “during the taping of the orchestral track for ‘I Don't Wanna Be Kissed,’ Davis unexpectedly played a few random portions of his solo. Months later at the overdub session, he had to tailor new passages to lead in and out of what he had already played on the prerecorded track. During five attempts, Davis used a variety of rhetorical devices (many borrowed from his mentor, Lester Young) to solve a musical problem.” In other words, the Miles Davis playing you hear was stitched together from six different takes, five of which were overdubs.

When Dave Lambert & His Singers, who would soon become Lambert, Hendricks, and Ross, recorded their debut album Sing a Song of Basie in 1957, each singer sang his/her part separately, all overdubbed. Here’s “Little Pony” from that record.

Creed Taylor produced not only the Lambert record, but Bill Evans’s 1963 Conversations with Myself, an overdubbed and Grammy-winning three-piano album. But Evans may have been taking a cue from Lennie Tristano’s 1955 “Turkish Mambo,” also featuring three overdubbed piano tracks. Here’s “How About You?” from that record. Conversations with Myself sounds pretty gimmicky at first, but I don’t think Evans’s rhythmic genius was ever put on better display.

Charles Mingus’s 1963 The Black Saint and the Sinner Lady relies on extensive overdubs. The first 2:45 of “Track C: Group Dancers” is recorded straight. At that point, Charlie Mariano’s alto sax begins wailing, the guitar comes in, and the collective improvisation begins. Well, Mariano’s entire 4-minute-plus brilliant alto sax solo was entirely overdubbed.

The overdub never really died. Pharaoh Sanders used it on his 1970 album Thembi. Pat Metheny used overdubs on Bright Size Life and New Chautauqua later that decade. Smooth jazz hasn’t been hesitant about using overdubs, even overdubbing over dead people’s music (e.g. Kenny G overdubbing lame sax solos over Louis Armstrong’s “It’s a Wonderful World,” which caused Pat Metheny to throw a memorable fit.) To conclude, here’s Matthew Shipp’s “Space Shipp,” from his 2002 Nu Bop, on which I surmise, from reading an interview with Shipp, that William Parker’s bass is overdubbed; and Jason Moran’s overdubbed take on Afrika Bambaataa’s “Planet Rock,” from his breathtaking 2002 album Modernistic.

If one sticks to conventional wisdom, there’s something very wrong with all of these tracks. They’re studio gimmicks; they’re not real jazz; they violate the very principles of jazz. They’re fake, phony, inauthentic.

Back in 2002, when The Future of Jazz, a book I edited, came out, I gave an interview about jazz in which I said, “Classical music is a written art form; rock is (or has become) a recorded art form; jazz is a live art form. Of course, this is essentialist thinking, but I do think it gets to the heart of the music. The major appeal of classical music lies in harmony, in the play of resolutions and dissonances. The major appeal of rock music, at least after 1965, lies in the manipulation of electronic sound. And the major appeal of jazz will always lie in improvisation, which really has very little to do with the recording process. Improvisation is done on the spur of the moment, live.”

Here I stated in a concise form jazz’s essentialist position, one which I’m reluctant to deny now. I really do believe that overdubbing goes against jazz’s fundamental nature.

So why do the tracks I’ve posted above sound so good? Why is there more improvisational brilliance on every single one of these tracks than in the mass of Wynton Marsalis’s non-overdubbed records?

Because playing with new technology has always been a fundamental part of jazz too. If Sidney Bechet, Les Paul, Lennie Tristano, and Miles Davis aren’t enough to prove that, just think of the fact that the saxophone was one of the newest instruments around when it became one of the central instruments of jazz, and that both the electric guitar and vibraphone began as jazz instruments. Jazz has always been experimental, cutting-edge.

Studio trickery can get in the way. I find Miles Davis’s studio electric albums, with their splices and cross-fades, less satisfying than his unedited and live cuts from the same period--there’s a momentum to Agharta that Jack Johnson only hints at. Most of Jason Moran’s Modernistic is even better than “Planet Rock,” its only overdubbed cut, and I’d rather hear Sidney Bechet’s small-group sides or Bill Evans’s piano trio over their overdubbed work any day.

But as long as musicians ensure that studio trickery doesn’t interfere with the thrill that great improvising can create, let them use as much studio trickery as they want. Not all, but the majority of the most exciting jazz records of the last decade have been impeccably produced studio products, records that sound in some ways like rock records. Even if presenting something fresh and new occasionally smacks of inauthenticity, its rewards can be irresistible.

- Yuval

What the Folk Are You Singing About?

That's the teaser for a piece we wrote entitled "Segregation Blues" which appeared in today's issue of The Guardian. The arts editor asked us to write a piece about "why folk music is a racist con," and we were happy to oblige him. Check it out.

- Hugh and Yuval

Blog powered by TypePad

What people are saying about our book

  • 9/07
    "[A] perceptive exploration of authenticity and its meaning in 20th-century popular music. . . . Highly recommended." --M. Goldsmith, Choice
  • 7/1/07
    "This revelatory book is a must for anyone who has been an ambivalent pop music fan. . . . An exhaustive and thought-provoking book that deserves serious attention." --Alan Licht, The Wire
  • 5/22
    [Four stars] "Whether nailing how perceptions of the blues were moulded by the racist cultural bias of those who originally recorded it or assessing the multi-dimensional pranksterism of the KLF, this well-researched, informative and thought-provoking book pierces the bubble of what pop authenticity really means." --Thomas H. Green, Q Magazine
  • 4/18
    [five stars] "Enthusiastic . . . superb. . . . Like all great music writing, Faking It is unashamedly subjective and, above all, makes you wish you were listening to the records it describes." --Martin Hemming, Time Out London
  • 4/17
    "Essential reading for anyone who really loves pop." --Paul Connolly, London Lite
  • 4/16
    “Persuasive . . . powerful. . . . A fascinating and nimble investigation of pop’s paradoxes. . . . A great collection of true stories about fake music. It's the essay as Möbius strip; a literary illusion that . . . tells us more about what's true, what's not, and why that doesn't always matter, than a more straightforward confrontation with the secrets and lies of pop music ever could.” --Jeff Sharlet, New Statesman
  • 4/15
    “Valuable . . . instructive . . . Taylor, who has written extensively on slavery, is particularly strong when discussing how the music of the American South was divided along race lines by the fledgling record industry, even when white and black artists had almost identical repertoires. The chapters on Jimmie Rodgers's autobiographical 'TB Blues' and Elvis's 'Heartbreak Hotel' are excellent.” --Campbell Stevenson, The Observer
  • 4/14
    “Diabolically provocative . . . [A] tightly focused examination of why, when and how authenticity became such a powerful force in popular music – and eventually its key marketing tool.” --Greg Quinn, Toronto Star
  • 4/11/07
    “The authors skillfully navigate a complicated musical past. . . . The book avoids the prose pitfalls of dry academic work and is not without humor. . . . Among the most notable essays is a bracing consideration of Donna Summer and her disco hit ‘Love to Love You Baby,’ the hypnotic epic of simulated female orgasm. In this chapter, Barker and Taylor nicely fuse a brief history of early disco with a larger contemplation of the tensions between authenticity and artifice in the disco era. As good as the authors' defense of disco is, it's topped by a riveting analysis of the career of John Lydon. In this finely nuanced chapter, Barker and Taylor penetrate the core contradictions within the punk scene, a genre rife with internal debates over authenticity and fakery.” --Chrissie Dickinson, Washington Post
  • 4/11/07
    “This is a work by two fanatics that, through copious research and profound contemplation, offers fellow fans a stimulating semantic exercise . . . and, more significantly, carte blanche to enjoy guilty pleasures without guilt. . . . Barker’s obvious passion for and deep understanding of manufactured pop make his chapters fascinating. . . . The exquisite research and nuanced insight Barker brings to [Donna Summer’s] moans and groans makes ['Love to Love You Baby'] one of the strongest chapters in the book. . . . [And Taylor’s 'Heartbreak Hotel'] is one of the most passionate, articulate love letters to the King I have ever read.” --Jake Austen, Chicago Journal
  • 4/7/07
    "Merrily throwing in references from R. Kelly to Mississippi John Hurt to the KLF, . . . Faking It is dynamite for the pop subversive. . . . The arguments are very persuasive." --Bob Stanley, The (London) Times
  • 4/1/07
    “What Faking It shows us, through an impressive array of eras and musicians, is that the quest for purity in pop is a fool’s errand. . . . Faking It is a fascinating read based on a truly provocative and enlightening argument. It will be hard to think about pop music in the same way again.” --Nora Young, Toronto Star
  • 3/28/07
    “Hugh Barker and Yuval Taylor certainly know their stuff and have fun poking and prodding at our idols.” --Jonathan Gibbs, Metro
  • 3/28/07
    “In 10 chapters--each addressing a particular song or song cover as a starting point before running rabid over all kinds of cultural, racial, and social terrain--[the authors] trace the shifting importance of originality in popular music from the early 20th century to the early 21st with diplomatic élan and overachieving gusto, . . . smashing precious illusions like microbrew bottles along the way. . . . Faking It is certain to inspire some awesome conversations among readers.” --Raymond Cummings, Baltimore City Paper
  • 3/22/07
    "Sure to fuel arguments among music nerds for years to come. . . . Taken as a whole, the book becomes a fascinating, complex study of the increasingly blurred line between actuality and artifice." --Ira Brooker, Time Out Chicago
  • 3/14/07
    "A brutal attack on what professor David Lowethal called 'the dogma of self-delusion,' which basically kills the entire concept of 'authentic' alternative culture, eats it, shits it, buries it, digs it up, burns it, eats it and shits it out again. And then nails it to a canvas and calls it art. I intend to carry this book around with me. And the next time I meet a DJ who looks like he might be about to use the phrase 'keeping it real,' I shall smack him in the head with it. Repeatedly." --Steven Wells, Philadelphia Weekly
  • 3/4/07
    "Combines a strong point of view, intelligent and informed musical analysis, and rigorous historical research." --Ben Yagoda, The New York Times Book Review
  • 2/18/07
    “Essential . . . a model of lucidity and concision. . . . Barker and Taylor might make great house builders. They lay a solid foundation for their argument that popular music is inherently 'impure.' . . . Part of the fun here is the way the writers trust their ears. . . . [A] smart, passionate book.” --Charles Taylor, Newsday
  • 2/15/07
    "With plenty of interesting and contentious assertions to stimulate even casual readers, this is a heck of an argument starter." --Booklist
  • 2/15/07
    "Insightful. . . . Faking It delivers lots of good stories." --Michael Washburn, Time Out New York
  • 2/9/07
    “Provocative . . . incendiary . . . fascinating.” --Ron Wynn, Nashville City Paper

The most essential songs discussed in Faking It