« Telling Your Band's Story in a Song | Main | Improvised Rock Lyrics »

January 06, 2007

Mystery in American Song

Bob Dylan once said, “All these songs about roses growing out of people’s brains and lovers who are really geese and swans that turn into angels. . . . I mean, you’d think that the traditional-music people could gather from their songs that mystery is a fact, a traditional fact.”

Dylan may or may not have come up with this idea back in 1967, when he told this to Nat Hentoff in his justly famous Playboy interview. But the idea took hold. Simply put, the idea was this: that in traditional American songs are mysteries, and these mysteries are not solvable ones. Instead they lend the music a quasi-religious significance. The mysteries in traditional American songs are akin to the mysteries of faith--the unknowability of God, of death, of salvation.

This brings up a question. Did the people who created and sang these songs find them mysterious themselves, or is the mystery we find in them purely a product of our distance from them?

First, let’s look at “The Old Black Crow in the Hickory Tree,” first recorded by Harry Frankel in 1924 and 1925, and then by The Allen Brothers in 1930. The song starts by posing the mystery of the old black crow in the hickory nut tree, but never tells us exactly what is so mysterious about it. The rest of the song is a series of jokes, interspersed with the chorus: “It certainly is a mystery about the old black crow in the hickory nut tree.”

The song was most likely a minstrel number, and could have been anywhere from ten to fifty years old when it was first recorded. Frankel, a minstrel performer from Indiana who lived in New York, later said that he didn’t write his own material, and I have no idea if the Allen Brothers heard Frankel’s version or whether the song was simply frequently performed back then.

At any rate, what strikes me is that the song is all about a mystery, and we don’t find out what the mystery is. In other words, the whole concept of mystery is treated as just as much of a joke as the doctor who falls in the well because he should have been tending the sick.

The same thing happens in Diddie Wah Diddie,” here performed by Blind Blake. Once again, we’re introduced to a mystery in the first verse, and the chorus is about the same mystery; the rest of the song is a series of jokes.

So here are two examples, both of them probably from the nineteenth or very early twentieth century, of songs that deliberately obfuscate meaning, that create mystery by talking nonsense, all the while commenting on that very fact. In other words, to use a British phrase, they’re taking the piss out of mystery.

Harry Smith, who compiled Folkway’s Anthology of American Folk Music, was quite enamored of mystery. He began Volume 3 of the Anthology, the one devoted to “songs” (as opposed to “ballads” and “social music”), with Clarence Ashley’s The Coo Coo Bird,” probably one of the hardest songs to summarize because every verse is about something completely different. But in the light of “Diddie Wah Diddie” and “Old Black Crow,” it’s pretty easy to figure out what’s going on in this song: it’s nonsense, plain and simple.

You have to keep in mind that there was very little mystery in the popular songs of the 1950s and early ’60s; by contrast, the commercial cultural musical products of the South a generation or two earlier already sounded as weird to Smith and Dylan as traditional Bulgarian, Mongolian, or Central African music might have. There were various reasons to be impressed with the mysteries of this old music: the methods of transmission through the ages had resulted in strange corruptions and recombinations, the sound was abrasive and harsh in comparison to contemporary music, the subject matter often implied the universality of death.

I won’t claim that there’s nothing really mysterious about the old traditional American songs. But I do think that with a little digging you can find pretty reasonable explanations. Some songs were mysterious on purpose--Blind Willie Johnson’s Dark Was the Night--Cold Was the Groundis clearly meant to be as mysterious as God himself, especially since Blind Willie Johnson’s other songs are all about God. (Dolly Parton’s The Mystery of the Mysteryis another song that falls firmly in the religious camp.) Junior Parker's "Mystery Train" is also deliberately mysterious, quite self-consciously so. Some songs, on the other hand, were mysterious as a joke. And some songs were simply nonsense--which is inherently mysterious if you try to take it seriously.

I’m going to come out and say it: Dylan was wrong. I think it’s important to make a distinction between the kind of mysteries one solves and the kind of mysteries that confront us when faced with the ineffable. It’s only natural and probably inevitable that we should confuse the two, so that what is not yet solved gains an aura of the sacred. We naturally, then, elevate the more mysterious products of our culture. The mysteries they evoke lend them depth, and we call them more authentic, among other things. This is what attracted Dylan and Smith to them, and, in part, what caused them to elevate the “old, weird America” (to quote Greil Marcus) over, say, the relatively un-mysterious music of Duke Ellington or Cole Porter.

But if we rob traditional music of its mystery, are we necessarily lessening our enjoyment of it? This reminds me of how entranced I used to be by R.E.M.’s Murmur when it first came out, or how the mysteries of what Mick Jagger was really singing in various places on Exile on Main Street kept me listening far more studiously than if I’d known all the lyrics. As any reader of crime novels or watcher of crime shows can attest, mystery is very compelling stuff.

But what makes mysteries compelling isn’t just letting them sit there, or accepting them as fact, as Dylan advocated. What makes mysteries compelling is trying to solve them. I hope I’ve solved a few, and I hope you can too.

--Yuval

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/1115811/7403803

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mystery in American Song:

Comments

I offer the theory that Dylan championed mysteries because it meant that if his own songs didn't make a whole lot of sense it might always be ascribed to mysticism rather than the ingesting of mind-altering substances. "If dogs run free, then why not we?" Us enjoyed that one.

Just a word of thanks. My maternal grandmother Goldie Ford Morris (1907-1989) would have been 100 this past week. When I was a child, she would sing "The Old Black Crow.." to me. Your .mp3 recording is the first I've found which mentions the horse, the flea and mice shooting dice. Where did you find it?

On an Allen Brothers CD which I bought for other reasons. I became quite enamored of this track. I'm so glad that you've found this song, and it's great that your grandmother used to sing it to you.

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Blog powered by TypePad

What people are saying about our book

  • 9/07
    "[A] perceptive exploration of authenticity and its meaning in 20th-century popular music. . . . Highly recommended." --M. Goldsmith, Choice
  • 7/1/07
    "This revelatory book is a must for anyone who has been an ambivalent pop music fan. . . . An exhaustive and thought-provoking book that deserves serious attention." --Alan Licht, The Wire
  • 5/22
    [Four stars] "Whether nailing how perceptions of the blues were moulded by the racist cultural bias of those who originally recorded it or assessing the multi-dimensional pranksterism of the KLF, this well-researched, informative and thought-provoking book pierces the bubble of what pop authenticity really means." --Thomas H. Green, Q Magazine
  • 4/18
    [five stars] "Enthusiastic . . . superb. . . . Like all great music writing, Faking It is unashamedly subjective and, above all, makes you wish you were listening to the records it describes." --Martin Hemming, Time Out London
  • 4/17
    "Essential reading for anyone who really loves pop." --Paul Connolly, London Lite
  • 4/16
    “Persuasive . . . powerful. . . . A fascinating and nimble investigation of pop’s paradoxes. . . . A great collection of true stories about fake music. It's the essay as Möbius strip; a literary illusion that . . . tells us more about what's true, what's not, and why that doesn't always matter, than a more straightforward confrontation with the secrets and lies of pop music ever could.” --Jeff Sharlet, New Statesman
  • 4/15
    “Valuable . . . instructive . . . Taylor, who has written extensively on slavery, is particularly strong when discussing how the music of the American South was divided along race lines by the fledgling record industry, even when white and black artists had almost identical repertoires. The chapters on Jimmie Rodgers's autobiographical 'TB Blues' and Elvis's 'Heartbreak Hotel' are excellent.” --Campbell Stevenson, The Observer
  • 4/14
    “Diabolically provocative . . . [A] tightly focused examination of why, when and how authenticity became such a powerful force in popular music – and eventually its key marketing tool.” --Greg Quinn, Toronto Star
  • 4/11/07
    “The authors skillfully navigate a complicated musical past. . . . The book avoids the prose pitfalls of dry academic work and is not without humor. . . . Among the most notable essays is a bracing consideration of Donna Summer and her disco hit ‘Love to Love You Baby,’ the hypnotic epic of simulated female orgasm. In this chapter, Barker and Taylor nicely fuse a brief history of early disco with a larger contemplation of the tensions between authenticity and artifice in the disco era. As good as the authors' defense of disco is, it's topped by a riveting analysis of the career of John Lydon. In this finely nuanced chapter, Barker and Taylor penetrate the core contradictions within the punk scene, a genre rife with internal debates over authenticity and fakery.” --Chrissie Dickinson, Washington Post
  • 4/11/07
    “This is a work by two fanatics that, through copious research and profound contemplation, offers fellow fans a stimulating semantic exercise . . . and, more significantly, carte blanche to enjoy guilty pleasures without guilt. . . . Barker’s obvious passion for and deep understanding of manufactured pop make his chapters fascinating. . . . The exquisite research and nuanced insight Barker brings to [Donna Summer’s] moans and groans makes ['Love to Love You Baby'] one of the strongest chapters in the book. . . . [And Taylor’s 'Heartbreak Hotel'] is one of the most passionate, articulate love letters to the King I have ever read.” --Jake Austen, Chicago Journal
  • 4/7/07
    "Merrily throwing in references from R. Kelly to Mississippi John Hurt to the KLF, . . . Faking It is dynamite for the pop subversive. . . . The arguments are very persuasive." --Bob Stanley, The (London) Times
  • 4/1/07
    “What Faking It shows us, through an impressive array of eras and musicians, is that the quest for purity in pop is a fool’s errand. . . . Faking It is a fascinating read based on a truly provocative and enlightening argument. It will be hard to think about pop music in the same way again.” --Nora Young, Toronto Star
  • 3/28/07
    “Hugh Barker and Yuval Taylor certainly know their stuff and have fun poking and prodding at our idols.” --Jonathan Gibbs, Metro
  • 3/28/07
    “In 10 chapters--each addressing a particular song or song cover as a starting point before running rabid over all kinds of cultural, racial, and social terrain--[the authors] trace the shifting importance of originality in popular music from the early 20th century to the early 21st with diplomatic élan and overachieving gusto, . . . smashing precious illusions like microbrew bottles along the way. . . . Faking It is certain to inspire some awesome conversations among readers.” --Raymond Cummings, Baltimore City Paper
  • 3/22/07
    "Sure to fuel arguments among music nerds for years to come. . . . Taken as a whole, the book becomes a fascinating, complex study of the increasingly blurred line between actuality and artifice." --Ira Brooker, Time Out Chicago
  • 3/14/07
    "A brutal attack on what professor David Lowethal called 'the dogma of self-delusion,' which basically kills the entire concept of 'authentic' alternative culture, eats it, shits it, buries it, digs it up, burns it, eats it and shits it out again. And then nails it to a canvas and calls it art. I intend to carry this book around with me. And the next time I meet a DJ who looks like he might be about to use the phrase 'keeping it real,' I shall smack him in the head with it. Repeatedly." --Steven Wells, Philadelphia Weekly
  • 3/4/07
    "Combines a strong point of view, intelligent and informed musical analysis, and rigorous historical research." --Ben Yagoda, The New York Times Book Review
  • 2/18/07
    “Essential . . . a model of lucidity and concision. . . . Barker and Taylor might make great house builders. They lay a solid foundation for their argument that popular music is inherently 'impure.' . . . Part of the fun here is the way the writers trust their ears. . . . [A] smart, passionate book.” --Charles Taylor, Newsday
  • 2/15/07
    "With plenty of interesting and contentious assertions to stimulate even casual readers, this is a heck of an argument starter." --Booklist
  • 2/15/07
    "Insightful. . . . Faking It delivers lots of good stories." --Michael Washburn, Time Out New York
  • 2/9/07
    “Provocative . . . incendiary . . . fascinating.” --Ron Wynn, Nashville City Paper

The most essential songs discussed in Faking It