« Local News | Main | Mystery in American Song »

December 27, 2006

Telling Your Band's Story in a Song

What was the first song in which a band told its own story?

The answer is found on three singles released in 1967. In April of that year, by sheer coincidence, the Mamas and the Papas came out with “Creeque Alley” (an a-side) and Paul Revere and the Raiders came out with The Legend of Paul Revere (the b-side of “Him or Me, What’s It Gonna Be”). Don’t ask me why, all of a sudden, two of America’s top rock acts decided to tell their stories in song--trust me, it hadn’t been done before. 

Well, actually, it had. In fact, way back in 1965, Van Morrison’s band Them recorded “The Story of Them” (part 1 and part 2), which, I have to warn you, is a total bore. But “The Story of Them” wasn’t released until September 1967 (again, as a 45-rpm single), five months after “Creeque Alley” and “The Legend of Paul Revere.”

"Creeque Alley" is fascinating, but it's not really a great song--there are way too many in-jokes for my taste, it's pretty cruel to Mama Cass, and it features one of the lamest flute solos I've ever heard. “The Legend of Paul Revere” is far better--I love the way they namecheck Dick Clark and then complain about how hectic their lives have become. As for “The Story of Them,” it was improvised in the studio, and it’s perhaps the closest a rock band has come to the stream-of-unconsciousness of Lightnin’ Hopkins (Hopkins used to sit down and sing for hours about whatever happened to be on his mind, which often wasn’t a whole lot).

These songs are one facet of a genre I’ve identified as autobiographical song. What I mean is not vague stuff like Hank Williams’s songs or Percy Sledge’s “When a Man Loves a Woman.” What I mean is a song that tells a detailed story that really happened to the singer. (The Barbarians’ terrific 1965 single “Moulty” would qualify, except that Moulty didn’t write it, and the Barbarians didn't actually play on the song.)

Van Morrison would soon become the king of autobiographical song, pop music’s very own Marcel Proust, revealing more about his childhood and early years than anyone else before or since. Whether anyone really cared about his childhood and early years is another matter. As for me, I love Astral Weeks, the crown jewel of autobiographical song, but I get more joy from wacky lines like “The light is on the left side of your head” (from “Ballerina”) than from learning about Van’s younger days.

Now outside of a few blues songs, there hadn’t been much autobiography in the 1960s prior to the release of these singles. The only songs I can think of are the Beatles’ “Norwegian Wood” and Bob Dylan’s “Talking New York” and “Ballad in Plain D” (far from his best songs). Arlo Guthrie’s “Alice’s Restaurant” and Bobbie Gentry’s “Chickasaw County Child” were also released in 1967, though I doubt the Mamas and the Papas or Paul Revere had heard either of them by the time they recorded their songs. Most of the great autobiographical songs of the 1960s—the Beatles’ “Ballad of John and Yoko,” Astral Weeks, and so on—would come a wee bit later.

Autobiography has become something of a requirement in hit songs these days—just think of Ashlee Simpson’s albums Autobiography and I Am Me, or The Diary of Alicia Keys, or Usher’s Confessions. But back then it was damn hard to find.

In 1978, Freddy Weller, a country singer who had spent four years in Paul Revere’s band, released a song called “The Legend of Paul Revere and the Raiders,” one of my favorite autobiographical songs. Without hardly trying, Weller delivers a beautiful and ultra-succinct account of what it was like to be in a world-famous band and what happened when the band broke up. He hints that he wishes he were known more for his own career—which was pretty substantial—than for having once been a member of the band, but he seems pretty happy with the way things turned out. Could this be the best song ever about no longer being in a famous rock’n’roll band? It certainly beats John Lennon’s “How Do You Sleep.” (Van Morrison probably wrote a song about not being in Them anymore, but don’t ask me if I care.)

Here's a nice website devoted to the song “Creeque Alley.”

And here's  an invaluable list of band theme songs, though you won’t find Freddy Weller’s there.

—Yuval

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c6ff653ef00d83430904553ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Telling Your Band's Story in a Song:

» Hey Hey, We're the Glee Club from Zoilus
On what seems to be my blog-of-the week, Faking It, Yuval Taylor posted quite awhile back on the question of "band theme songs," which is addressed in the Faking It book as kind of a subtopic under the issue... [Read More]

Comments

Yuval, I have a feeling you might like my friend Sport Murphy's sort of unheralded album _Uncle_ (http://www.killrockstars.com/press/383/ ). autobiographical in the extreme and, in a way, also about 'the news' (9/11, but, more relevantly, his nephew's death on 9/11) -- but also integrating 'documentary' (in the form of childhood and family tape recordings) -- it's like little other music I've heard; but it's hard to tell if a personal acquaintance with the artist is a minor prerequisite (these explanations (http://www.killrockstars.com/press/383/comments.html ) may help). I'll try to get you a copy..

mc

remember "ballad of the gizmos" ?

i just wanted to put in a plug for my favorite story-of-the-band song, saturday gigs by mott the hoople.

and to say that i loved the paul revere song. thanks for giving it to us.

Here's an e-mailed conversation with Eric Weisbard on this topic:

Eric: Did the Monkeys theme song precede the other “autobiographical” songs? Not that they wrote it, of course, just wondering if that’s a piece of the story there.

Yuval: Yes, it did--it was a Boyce and Hart number, came out in 1966. But it didn't tell the band's story at all, it just said, "Hey, we're the Monkees, come see us sing and play." Oh, and "we're the young generation, and we've got something to say." Of course, that last bit was a white lie.

But you're right--maybe it was part of the story, and I probably should have mentioned it in my post. It could very well be that the Mamas and the Papas and Paul Revere and the Raiders decided to write theme songs with more to them than the Monkees theme. Them's song, though, predates the Monkees in terms of recording date. And so does "Moulty."

Eric: I think that there was this quasi-cartoonish sense of the rock group as mythical media beings, likely started by A Hard Day’s Night, but what would I know, wasn’t even born then. In general, I suspect, a movie influencing a TV show influencing a set of pop songs is pretty typical cultural transmission, leaping across formal boundaries but all part of the same general “conversation.”

Reading Eric and Yuval's conversation I was thinking about the difference between a band doing an autobiographical song and a song that simply announces the band (as in 'We Are Motorhead', or Madness covering 'Madness').

Looking at the list of band theme songs, the latter approach is more common, and tends to come from bands that don't mind being seen as a bit preposterous (rather than bands who are bothered about authenticity). Because writing a song about how great your band are is a bit of an embarrassing thing to do - The Monkees were kind of lucky in having songwriters to do it for them (possibly before the band had even been chosen...?) I can't really imagine 'Hey, Hey we're REM' getting written, though you never know.

Band themes like 'Ant Music' or 'Monktime' seem designed to kick off a gig's setlist by 'introducing the band' rather than anything more personal. I can't immediately think of any examples, but wouldn't this kind of song have been performed by showbands in the 1950s or earlier? (I mean band themes rather than 'story of the band' songs.)

Yes, indeed, band theme songs far pre-date rock'n'roll. There's a nice one here: http://redhotjazz.com/Songs/misc/jtblues.ram (it's "Jasper Taylor Blues" by the Original Washboard Band with Jasper Taylor, 1928).

I mention an even earlier example in my post here:

http://www.zoilus.com/documents//2007/001026.php

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Blog powered by TypePad

What people are saying about our book

  • 9/07
    "[A] perceptive exploration of authenticity and its meaning in 20th-century popular music. . . . Highly recommended." --M. Goldsmith, Choice
  • 7/1/07
    "This revelatory book is a must for anyone who has been an ambivalent pop music fan. . . . An exhaustive and thought-provoking book that deserves serious attention." --Alan Licht, The Wire
  • 5/22
    [Four stars] "Whether nailing how perceptions of the blues were moulded by the racist cultural bias of those who originally recorded it or assessing the multi-dimensional pranksterism of the KLF, this well-researched, informative and thought-provoking book pierces the bubble of what pop authenticity really means." --Thomas H. Green, Q Magazine
  • 4/18
    [five stars] "Enthusiastic . . . superb. . . . Like all great music writing, Faking It is unashamedly subjective and, above all, makes you wish you were listening to the records it describes." --Martin Hemming, Time Out London
  • 4/17
    "Essential reading for anyone who really loves pop." --Paul Connolly, London Lite
  • 4/16
    “Persuasive . . . powerful. . . . A fascinating and nimble investigation of pop’s paradoxes. . . . A great collection of true stories about fake music. It's the essay as Möbius strip; a literary illusion that . . . tells us more about what's true, what's not, and why that doesn't always matter, than a more straightforward confrontation with the secrets and lies of pop music ever could.” --Jeff Sharlet, New Statesman
  • 4/15
    “Valuable . . . instructive . . . Taylor, who has written extensively on slavery, is particularly strong when discussing how the music of the American South was divided along race lines by the fledgling record industry, even when white and black artists had almost identical repertoires. The chapters on Jimmie Rodgers's autobiographical 'TB Blues' and Elvis's 'Heartbreak Hotel' are excellent.” --Campbell Stevenson, The Observer
  • 4/14
    “Diabolically provocative . . . [A] tightly focused examination of why, when and how authenticity became such a powerful force in popular music – and eventually its key marketing tool.” --Greg Quinn, Toronto Star
  • 4/11/07
    “The authors skillfully navigate a complicated musical past. . . . The book avoids the prose pitfalls of dry academic work and is not without humor. . . . Among the most notable essays is a bracing consideration of Donna Summer and her disco hit ‘Love to Love You Baby,’ the hypnotic epic of simulated female orgasm. In this chapter, Barker and Taylor nicely fuse a brief history of early disco with a larger contemplation of the tensions between authenticity and artifice in the disco era. As good as the authors' defense of disco is, it's topped by a riveting analysis of the career of John Lydon. In this finely nuanced chapter, Barker and Taylor penetrate the core contradictions within the punk scene, a genre rife with internal debates over authenticity and fakery.” --Chrissie Dickinson, Washington Post
  • 4/11/07
    “This is a work by two fanatics that, through copious research and profound contemplation, offers fellow fans a stimulating semantic exercise . . . and, more significantly, carte blanche to enjoy guilty pleasures without guilt. . . . Barker’s obvious passion for and deep understanding of manufactured pop make his chapters fascinating. . . . The exquisite research and nuanced insight Barker brings to [Donna Summer’s] moans and groans makes ['Love to Love You Baby'] one of the strongest chapters in the book. . . . [And Taylor’s 'Heartbreak Hotel'] is one of the most passionate, articulate love letters to the King I have ever read.” --Jake Austen, Chicago Journal
  • 4/7/07
    "Merrily throwing in references from R. Kelly to Mississippi John Hurt to the KLF, . . . Faking It is dynamite for the pop subversive. . . . The arguments are very persuasive." --Bob Stanley, The (London) Times
  • 4/1/07
    “What Faking It shows us, through an impressive array of eras and musicians, is that the quest for purity in pop is a fool’s errand. . . . Faking It is a fascinating read based on a truly provocative and enlightening argument. It will be hard to think about pop music in the same way again.” --Nora Young, Toronto Star
  • 3/28/07
    “Hugh Barker and Yuval Taylor certainly know their stuff and have fun poking and prodding at our idols.” --Jonathan Gibbs, Metro
  • 3/28/07
    “In 10 chapters--each addressing a particular song or song cover as a starting point before running rabid over all kinds of cultural, racial, and social terrain--[the authors] trace the shifting importance of originality in popular music from the early 20th century to the early 21st with diplomatic élan and overachieving gusto, . . . smashing precious illusions like microbrew bottles along the way. . . . Faking It is certain to inspire some awesome conversations among readers.” --Raymond Cummings, Baltimore City Paper
  • 3/22/07
    "Sure to fuel arguments among music nerds for years to come. . . . Taken as a whole, the book becomes a fascinating, complex study of the increasingly blurred line between actuality and artifice." --Ira Brooker, Time Out Chicago
  • 3/14/07
    "A brutal attack on what professor David Lowethal called 'the dogma of self-delusion,' which basically kills the entire concept of 'authentic' alternative culture, eats it, shits it, buries it, digs it up, burns it, eats it and shits it out again. And then nails it to a canvas and calls it art. I intend to carry this book around with me. And the next time I meet a DJ who looks like he might be about to use the phrase 'keeping it real,' I shall smack him in the head with it. Repeatedly." --Steven Wells, Philadelphia Weekly
  • 3/4/07
    "Combines a strong point of view, intelligent and informed musical analysis, and rigorous historical research." --Ben Yagoda, The New York Times Book Review
  • 2/18/07
    “Essential . . . a model of lucidity and concision. . . . Barker and Taylor might make great house builders. They lay a solid foundation for their argument that popular music is inherently 'impure.' . . . Part of the fun here is the way the writers trust their ears. . . . [A] smart, passionate book.” --Charles Taylor, Newsday
  • 2/15/07
    "With plenty of interesting and contentious assertions to stimulate even casual readers, this is a heck of an argument starter." --Booklist
  • 2/15/07
    "Insightful. . . . Faking It delivers lots of good stories." --Michael Washburn, Time Out New York
  • 2/9/07
    “Provocative . . . incendiary . . . fascinating.” --Ron Wynn, Nashville City Paper

The most essential songs discussed in Faking It